The XBB.1.5 is still the dominant strain there, comprising 73.6 percent of new virus cases. In the US, XBB.1.16 accounted for 9.6 percent of COVID-19 cases last week, data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention showed. "However, XBB.1.16 may become dominant in some countries and cause a rise in case incidence due to its growth advantage and immune escape characteristics." "Available information does not suggest that XBB.1.16 has additional public health risk relative to XBB.1.5 and the other currently circulating omicron descendent lineages," the WHO said in its initial risk assessment on April 17. To date, the global risk assessment for XBB.1.16 is low compared to XBB.1.5 and other currently circulating variants, the WHO also said. ![]() "However, currently available evidence for XBB.1.16 does not suggest any differences in disease severity and/or clinical manifestations compared to the original omicron variant," it added. "The variant was initially flagged due to its increasing global prevalence and for having mutations which may lead to increase in infectivity or pathogenicity," the DOH report said. So far, the XBB.1.16 has been reported in 33 countries and has been mostly documented in India. The World Health Organization designated the XBB.1.16 as variant of interest or VOI last week following a sustained increase in its prevalence. MANILA (UPDATE) - The Philippines has confirmed its first case of omicron subvariant XBB.1.16, which is spreading around the world, according to the Department of Health.īased on the agency's latest COVID-19 biosurveillance report, the case of XBB.1.16 was detected in Western Visayas.ĭubbed "Arcturus" on social media, the new COVID-19 offshoot is a descendent lineage of XBB, a recombinant of two BA.2 descendent lineages. Image captured at the NIAID Integrated Research Facility (IRF) in Fort Detrick, Maryland. See details below.Colorized scanning electron micrograph of a cell (red) infected with the Omicron strain of SARS-CoV-2 virus particles (yellow), isolated from a patient sample. The institution remains committed to maintaining a leadership role in providing the public and policymakers with cutting edge insights into COVID-19. This does not mean Johns Hopkins believes the pandemic is over. From the start, this effort should have been provided by the U.S. In addition, the federal government has improved its pandemic data tracking enough to warrant the CRC’s exit. ![]() Why did we shut down?Īfter three years of 24-7 operations, the CRC is ceasing its data collection efforts due to an increasing number of U.S. By March 3, 2020, Johns Hopkins expanded the site into a comprehensive collection of raw data and independent expert analysis known as the Coronavirus Resource Center (CRC) – an enterprise that harnessed the world-renowned expertise from across Johns Hopkins University & Medicine. But the map of red dots quickly evolved into the global go-to hub for monitoring a public health catastrophe. 22, 2020 as the COVID-19 Dashboard, operated by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering and the Applied Physics Laboratory. The Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center established a new standard for infectious disease tracking by publicly providing pandemic data in near real time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |